Commentary by Yalın Alpay
Necmi Gürseler’s Pure Ego Map: The Twirl of Collective Unconscious’ Universal Relations
Id
Is mankind historical or universal? Is a human being made
of experiences acquired during a lifetime, or is s/he born with an accumulated past and an immutable substance
embedded in his/her genetic codes? Necmi Gürseler’s answers to these questions through his paintings show that
the artist in search of a spiritual essence. This essence is the “id”. While accepting relativity and spiritual
evolution, he wishes to draw a limit to them and tries to disassemble the constructed psychology of post /
modern man, starting from the premodern period. For Gürseler, when artificial constructions of the modern and
postmodern periods are removed, what remains is the universal origins of the essence possessed by human beings.
For him, no matter how much personal experiences transform, no matter how post / modernization veils, there is
an unconscious, independent of its own consciousness and common with the entire humanity that resists
rationality, and that can be expressed only through mythological narratives. This collective unconscious is
reflected on all the decisions of the person, regardless of which history or geography s/he is in. What looks
dangerous to Gürseler is that the id, which is the ground for collective unconscious in its roots, is tamed by
modernity and then postmodernity to an extent that no trace is left behind. He stands against the cultural seen
as fiction, swallowing the primitive that he regards as original / natural: One must shift from Artificial to
the Essence.
But what is the essence? Collective unconscious is
invisible, it cannot be touched or described. It’s a feeling. Gürseler focuses not on what collective
unconscious is, but what it would look like if it could be seen. The feeling of the essence, that is the id, can
only be reproduced through symbols and this can be extended to a generated common meaning. Gürseler has to rely
on some familiar visuals in order to describe his narrative in a way that produces a common meaning. He chooses
mythological signs as the most appropriate visuals for the id. Thus, Gürseler’s paintings are arranged by
stories that rediscover / produce mythology, by figures that animate these stories, and by networks of meaning
that convey these figures. These networks of meanings are not signs that enunciate the signification they emit,
but rather symbols whose interpretability lasts forever. No visual stands in its place, all are equipped with
possibilities of meaning beyond the one they reflect. This is a gateway of archetypes, a journey from the canvas
into the human being, a guide to deep diving of what was never self-discovered before, in which each person can
reveal different aspects through their own personal experiences; a collective unconscious archaeological
excavation.
By nature of their field of inquiry, these works are
painted not with the conscious, but through the unconscious. There’s neither a sketch, nor a setup: Gürseler
sits in front of his canvas and in the blink of an eye creates a narrative under the sway of lines. He portrays
the collective unconscious through unconscious relationships that his own unconscious establishes with the
collective. Gürseler’s painting is a relationship between various kinds of unconscious.
A Map of the Unconscious
Gürseler’s work is an official map of the unconscious. In
this map, the topography, together with the public and personal memory are transformed into signs. Everything
from life to death, from jealousy to joy, from mental breakdown to well-being is infiltrated onto this map. When
looked at in detail, this map can refer to everything related to humankind and to life. However, since
Gürseler’s map is not a geography, but a reproduction of an unruly space unlike geography, its interpretation
extends to the infinity of personal possibilities as well as its construction. There is nothing in this map,
although there is reference to everything. This map is the “Existence” and the “Absence”. It requires a mind to
exist, and each mind decodes the map with its own allegories. As long as these allegories are not involved,
Gürseler’s map looks like a dead-end street, the meanings it refers to are beyond the meanings it produces in
itself. The gem of this treasure map is not on paper like a pirate scroll, but where the paper points
at.
Nonetheless, the map is an embodiment, a beginning for
consciousness, a bearing, a handle point, a framework within which the data of life can be placed. And the
singularity of this map, as well as of its very framework, makes it a unique interface that can be rebuilt every
time.
A Guide to Self-Understandin(terpretation)g Gürseler’s art is an interface for every viewer: a concretization step to look consciously at their unconscious. His paintings are a guide to self-understanding / interpretation. A guideline to being able to tell new lies to ourselves. And all numbers in this directory are each time, a call to ourselves. Some painters make self-portraits, Gürseler’s paintings are auto-calls. A map of generating new lies in one’s search for self. An attempt of the consciousness to give a consistent meaning to the inconsistent unconscious. Gürseler describes the abstraction of the unconscious with concreteness that can be translated into consciousness, whereas every interpreter of translation analyzes this inscription differently. While each code can be broken in Gürseler’s work, one has to encode new passwords to all of them. This map does not show what exists like geographic maps but implies. It’s based on opinions, not facts; here, a person does not open, but rather closes to him/herself. S/he narrows infinite possibilities with his/her consciousness. Definition limits the existing by reducing it, and Gürseler’s paintings allow to enframe a person. One has to demote in order to know oneself. Gürseler brings this degradation together with the widest pool of possibilities. The rest depends on the imagination and courage of the viewer. It is not Gürseler who narrows the possibilities, but the viewer… |
Primitive / Lean Lines, Identical Colors
Gürseler’s paintings are dominated by lines, the entire
work is adorned with lines. In Gürseler’s universe, a line is in its simplest form, considering it’s the idea
that is privileged and not the material. This is also an aesthetic preference that will suit Gürseler’s main
theme: the id. Whatever is artificial – covering the essence – is excluded from Gürseler’s drawing. Each figure,
building, animal, or mythological creature is completed in the most common representation by which one can
understand what they are. The painting’s details are not created by the details in the figures, but in the
complex relationships between these figures.
Although Gürseler does not use more than three colors per
painting, his work looks extremely colorful. The reason is the way he enriches the colors he uses – albeit
limited – with their own intermediate tones. Gürseler’s painting, rich in terms of formal figures, refers not to
the particularity of the individual, but to the collective unconscious of humanity, and since he thinks that
contrary to all subjective human qualities, the collective unconscious is the same in all human beings, he
paints all figures with the same color. The body structures of all of these figures also look identical and
almost all of them are completely naked. Although there is room for sexuality from time to time in this nudity,
no hidden eroticism exists. The reason why all of the figures are represented with very simple drawings and
paintings, and why they look identical, both naked and physically, is because Gürseler wants to make visible,
the essence that is the same in all human beings. In his drawings, Gürseler withdraws one by one all different
eye colors, body types, clothes and jewelry that differentiate people. What is symbolized here is that
individuals are stripped of their particular characteristics until they cease to be an individual, and this
process continues until all humans reach an essence where everyone looks the same. When all features
differentiating a human from others are removed, the remaining substance is an identical essence with that of
all other people in Gürseler’s universe. This gem is the collective unconscious for Gürseler. A person’s entire
operating system, algorithms, life-comprehension strategies, perception and sense networks, and intuitions are
the embodiment of this collective unconscious. Gürseler wants to paint not the individuals, but their common
essence, an invisible piece of equipment. The method Gürseler has come up with to depict this invisible essence
is to strip people’s own selves until they reach a collective self, making them all identical.
Mythological Figures
Among figures, references to the earliest mythological
symbols of Ancient Greece, Ancient Egypt, and Buddhism are common. Human bodies with animal heads and figures
wearing authentic headdresses are inspired by Egyptian mythology, while figures with athletic bodies, curly hair
and bushy beards are reminders of ancient Greek sculptures from Mount Olympus. Greek mythological figures like
unicorns, centaurs, sirens, gods such as Zeus, Poseidon, human heroes such as Odysseus tied to the main mast of
his ship, and Greek pillars are all scattered in Gürseler’s paintings. Buddhist mythology is represented with
cross-legged figures. Mythological images are used directly as well as through other painters’ mythological
drawings. Among Gürseler’s naked identical figures, the viewer may suddenly encounter a reference to Matisse’s
pagan dance composition, or other famous visuals reflecting the collective unconscious.
Gürseler’s Unconscious Metaphors
In addition to mythological images of the collective
unconscious, Gürseler’s personal unconscious is also reflected in his paintings. Hearts with simplified
biological forms, roses and fish are visible to the attentive eye in some unexpected corners of Gürseler’s
paintings. The frequently used Galata Tower, various castle gates, inscriptions written on different pillars or
towers, and a man hanged by his neck who makes himself some room in a corner appear in almost every painting. In
these images, Gürseler’s unconscious, which is a subset of the collective unconscious, is both separated from
the collective unconscious and connected to it with separate links.
Interdimensional Relation
Gürseler’s paintings are built on a two-dimensional
stacking. They are spread over a large rectangular background where all figures and objects look as if they were
hovering in a symbolic space that does not look like any place on earth. There is no distance or proximity, no
depth, they all have been deliberately removed from the painting. Gürseler’s preference for a two-dimensional
plane derives from his desire to suspend time and space in his painting. In a non-existent space, in a universe
where everything historical is removed from the figures, when everything time and space related disappears, the
painting shows immediately the infinite, that is the universal, the essence that does not change based on time
and space.
However, from time to time he shutters this consciously
used two-dimensionality with some staircase drawings. Sometimes a mobile wooden staircase, sometimes imposing
marble stairs of an elegant architectural space, and sometimes totally independent, unconnected stairs with no
beginning and no end, rising to the uncertainty of the sky bring a deepness to the image on the surface. The
fact that the third dimension gets into the painting almost only through staircases seems to be associated with
the stairs, imagined as an intermediate transition used to change dimensions. Gürseler symbolizes the seemingly
immutable elements of the collective unconscious in two dimensions, and the changing paradigms with
three-dimensional stairs. Thus, Gürseler refers to the fact that the collective unconscious of the humankind
remains constant even though the dimension changes for the society or the paradigm is fractured, and even though
we shift from primitive to premodern and from modern to postmodern through these fractions. Gürseler’s stairs
ascending to the sky by leaving an open end also point to an unknown post-postmodern stage, yet they too will
remain under the sway of the collective unconscious.
Mystery Doesn’t Find Refuge Under a Shadow
Gürseler’s art is two-dimensional, hence there is no room
for shadows. The light directly hits the entire painting evenly, with the same illumination. The source of the
light is where the viewer is, that is, directly across the painting. Since no shadows are used, all figures are
under the light with their utmost clarity, they cannot hide themselves, everything is crystal clear. Mystery is
hidden in itself not in the plastic properties of the images, but in the sense they make.
Chaotic Stacking
There’s no single void in Gürseler’s painting, the entire
canvas is packed with fullness. His paintings are so full that, at first glance, neither all the figures, nor
the complete composition, nor the entire narrative can be grasped. Besides, the eclectic structures of the
paintings bring together multiple narratives instead of a single one, whether they are connected to each other
or not is not an issue. Gürseler’s compositions are paintings in which layers of chaotic stacking are brought
together by suspending space. As much as his own image, every figure opens up to visuals, to concepts, feelings
and stories that are not his own; while producing different meanings by themselves, they scatter into various
possibilities of meaning in Gürseler’s universe. The visuals in Gürseler’s work are related to other elements in
the painting, while making reference outside the big picture. Yet these connections are invisible links; the
network of relationships here is like in real life; there is a butterfly effect, but it remains unclear which
element affects which one through which action. It is not possible for experience to always give accurate
answers to this presupposition of logic. That’s why, rather than a cosmos, a chaos seems to prevail in his
paintings. Nevertheless, there is harmony in this chaos.
The distances between the figures are filled with rhythmic
linear patterns. As they fold in curls, these repetitive linear movements make their presence felt even without
turning into a sea or hair, or to brick walls when they consist of rectangles or to black and white
checker-style squares into the interior floors or the entrance of a castle.
A Divine View
The perspective that Gürseler permits himself in his
relationship with his paintings is always overhead, broad and divine. Although the paintings include many
figures, the viewer never sees them from the figures’ point of view or as if they were one of those figures. He
can simultaneously visualize many things that people cannot see. Many figures, unaware of each other, are under
the eyes of the viewer. The fact that the figures are naked indicates that they cannot hide anything from the
painter’s or the viewer’s eyes.
Portrayals of Hope
Gürseler’s paintings are primitive postmodern tributes.
Today, the opportunity to look back at times when the primitive self was seen as golden age, and to return to
that primitive golden era by giving up everything is out of question for the postmodern man. Yet Gürseler points
out to another possibility, that even if postmodernity could uproot everything, confine existence to the
surface, and disengage all links with the ground, one can still re-establish connections with his/her id.
Gürseler hopes that through the symbols of the collective unconscious one can excavate one’s self, reveal
his/her own roots through this excavation and take shelter in the natural and essential truth, against what’s
artificial. Gürseler’s paintings are portrayals of this very hope.
Yalın Alpay
Note : Please use this link to access Yalın Alpay interview video with Necmi Gürseler (Youtube video).